Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
white_hart: (Default)
I first read Ursula Le Guin's The Dispossessed when I was in my early teens, though I can't remember exactly when; my copy is a 1987 reprinting, but I think I remember reading it on the bus back from swimming lessons at the Aldershot pool which were a PE option in the spring term of my fourth year of secondary school, which would have been early 1989 (although that might have been a re-read). Whatever the exact date was, it made a deep and lasting impression on me; the utopian-anarchist ideology of Odonianism, harnessing community and mutual aid for survival in a harsh environment, helped to shape my own political beliefs, and the novel also depicts a fluidity of attraction that I think was actually more fundamental than the possibly more obvious The Left Hand of Darkness in showing me that monosexuality wasn't actually the only option.

It may be 30 years since I first read it, and approaching half a century since the book was first published, but re-reading it now some of the social commentary (and the mention of dead, polluted Earth, still littered with the indestructible plastic waste of previous generations) felt more relevant to the world of 2018 than it did to me in the late 80s. Some of the language has dated; there's a lot of generic "he" where I think "they" would be used in a book published now, and "mankind" instead of "humanity", but I can forgive Le Guin that when it's in a context of a novel that tries to depict a society without gender roles, and then to set it against a patriarchy so extreme women are all but invisible. It's a slow, thoughtful, philosophical book, with lots of digressions from the plot to explain the structure of Anarresti society and the ideas of Odonianism which underpin it. In less skillful hands, this might seem clunky but Le Guin's writing is as beautiful as always and the philosopy and plot complement each other perfectly.

Things which particularly struck me on this re-read: the description of the academic communities Shevek is part of, which suggest that academia is basically the same everywhere in the universe, never mind the ideology of the wider society it inhabits. The link Le Guin between creating and disrupting, furthering the revolution which has to keep moving to avoid becoming another system to revolt against. Cetian temporal physics, described by a character as a hybrid of maths, physics and philosophy but which I'd never realised before is basically the scientific proof of the truth of Four Quartets. Now I'm older, I find the philosophy of the novel, and the idea of suffering as the true constant in life and the source of all community, much easier to understand than I did as a teenager. (We are watching The Good Place at the moment and the two resonate interestingly together.) And I love the characters, especially Shevek, Takver and Bedap, as much as I always did, so re-reading felt like revisiting very old friends.
white_hart: (Default)
Every so often, over the last couple of years, I would find myself remembering how old Ursula Le Guin was and thinking "I am going to be devastated when we lose her."

And yes, I am devastated. No, I didn't know her personally (though I would have loved to) but she was such a huge influence on me, and knowing that she was alive always made the world seem like a slightly better place. And now she isn't, and it's like a sun has been eclipsed.

I was probably about eight when I first read the Earthsea Trilogy, as it was then. I didn't understand it all, at that age; it wasn't straightforward like Tolkien, but it was full of magic and I read everything of hers I could find throughout my childhood and teens. Recently, I've been re-reading a lot of her works, and reading others which I missed first time round (the last three Earthsea books, among others) and the magic hasn't diminished at all. If anything, it's grown.

And she's so much a part of me. The Dispossessed and 'The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas', between them, pretty much account for my whole political worldview. If I have a spiritual worldview, it owes a huge debt to Always Coming Home (that's the one I went and grabbed last night, once I'd stopped crying enough to want to read some of her words). And then there's A Very Long Way From Anywhere Else, which is a bit of an oddity, really; it's a realistic, contemporary-set novella about a friendship between two geeky teenagers, not SF or fantasy at all. But it was the only book, ever, that felt like it was directly addressing the muddled-up person I was at 13, or 14, or 15, whenever it was that I first found it. It was a book that said it was OK to be different and strange, and that maybe one day I'd meet people who were like me. It said I wasn't alone; I wasn't the only person walking around in a fog of depression, or spending more time inside my own head than out of it. And it convinced me that it might actually be possible to build a good enough working model of being human to get by, without having to bend myself out of shape pretending to be a normal I barely understood. I don't actually think it's hyperbole to say that it's a book that probably saved my life (in a fairly undramatic way; just that my teens weren't good, and having that book stopped them getting worse).

I also love and admire her for being so unafraid to admit that she might have got things wrong in her earlier work, and to do what she could to fix it. There are so many works that may have been progressive for their time, but seem far less so to a modern eye, and ninety-nine times out of a hundred everyone just shrugs and moves on. But Le Guin revisited Earthsea and realised that, for all its positives, she'd created a patriarchy, and so she wrote Tehanu and Tales from Earthsea and The Other Wind and explicitly addressed that, took it apart and looked at Earthsea instead from a female (and feminist perspective). She realised that using the pronoun "he" for the Gethenians in The Left Hand of Darkness obscured their androgynous nature, so she wrote 'Winter's King', where "she" is used instead; and then she realised that The Left Hand of Darkness implies that all Gethenian sex is heterosexual sex and wrote 'Coming of Age in Karhide' which makes it very clear that that is not the case.

And, finally, I often think of this post on her blog, written shortly after the 2016 US election, when the world was a very dark place, and which felt like a ray of light in that darkness. "I know what I want. I want to live with courage, with compassion, in patience, in peace", she wrote, and it helped me to see a way through.

A Meditation

The river that runs in the valley
makes the valley that holds it.

This is the doorway:
the valley of the river.

~

What wears away the hard stone,
the high mountain?
The wind. The dust on the wind.
The rain. The rain on the wind.

What wears the hardness of hate away?
Breath, tears.

~

Courage, compassion, patience
holding to their way:
the path to the doorway.

Profile

white_hart: (Default)
white_hart

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated May. 31st, 2025 08:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios