white_hart (
white_hart) wrote2021-08-31 06:33 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Non-Euclidean trousers (243/365)
I've made lots of pairs of elastic-waisted trousers over the last few years. This week, I made my first pair without elastic.

These are the Harper trousers from Wendy Ward's Sewing Basics for Every Body. It's a unisex pattern for traditional pleat-front menswear-style trousers, which appealed to me a lot, though I suspect that being a unisex pattern may account for the fact that they're tight on the upper hips and loose at the waist. I also found that the waistband was mysteriously a good two inches shorter than the waist of the trousers, so I had to cut the piece in half and add an extra bit at the back. I thought that maybe I'd made a mistake tracing the pattern (one of the worst things with patterns from books is that you end up having to trace off multi-sized patterns from sheets with several patterns overlaid on each other), as the notches lined up around three-quarters of the trousers and the difference all seemed to be in the right front, but when I checked back my pattern piece seemed to be symmetrical and my fronts are the same size, so I can only conclude that I have somehow managed to make non-Euclidean trousers.
Anyway, overall I'm quite pleased with these, though I'm not sure I will actually use the pattern again.

These are the Harper trousers from Wendy Ward's Sewing Basics for Every Body. It's a unisex pattern for traditional pleat-front menswear-style trousers, which appealed to me a lot, though I suspect that being a unisex pattern may account for the fact that they're tight on the upper hips and loose at the waist. I also found that the waistband was mysteriously a good two inches shorter than the waist of the trousers, so I had to cut the piece in half and add an extra bit at the back. I thought that maybe I'd made a mistake tracing the pattern (one of the worst things with patterns from books is that you end up having to trace off multi-sized patterns from sheets with several patterns overlaid on each other), as the notches lined up around three-quarters of the trousers and the difference all seemed to be in the right front, but when I checked back my pattern piece seemed to be symmetrical and my fronts are the same size, so I can only conclude that I have somehow managed to make non-Euclidean trousers.
Anyway, overall I'm quite pleased with these, though I'm not sure I will actually use the pattern again.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-09-01 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I have just given in and bought a couple of pairs of shorts, because I don't think I can make them for myself before the previous shorts become unwearably worn.
no subject
no subject
no subject