white_hart (
white_hart) wrote2021-05-10 07:15 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Tea matters (130/365)
The trouble with architects is that they seem to see buildings as primarily artistic, and not functional. Which is why every time we have a meeting about our new building it ends up overrunning with lots of people asking questions such as:
Where are people supposed to make tea?
Will there be a quiet space for people to sit and eat lunch?
If the kitchen is in the open foyer area, how do we make sure that people don't take other people's food, or personal mugs, or wine that's cooling for receptions? And who is going to tidy things up when (inevitably) people don't put their cups in the dishwasher?
Yes, but really, tea is actually important, and it just feels like it's been shoved in here as an afterthought. And no, saying "but there will be a cafe in the building" doesn't help, because who wants to pay through the nose for a teabag and some indifferently hot water?
And that is why this afternoon's committee meeting overran by 45 minutes and left me incapable of spending the rest of the day doing anything other than filing my email. Which, to be fair, did need doing.
Where are people supposed to make tea?
Will there be a quiet space for people to sit and eat lunch?
If the kitchen is in the open foyer area, how do we make sure that people don't take other people's food, or personal mugs, or wine that's cooling for receptions? And who is going to tidy things up when (inevitably) people don't put their cups in the dishwasher?
Yes, but really, tea is actually important, and it just feels like it's been shoved in here as an afterthought. And no, saying "but there will be a cafe in the building" doesn't help, because who wants to pay through the nose for a teabag and some indifferently hot water?
And that is why this afternoon's committee meeting overran by 45 minutes and left me incapable of spending the rest of the day doing anything other than filing my email. Which, to be fair, did need doing.
no subject
I was assuming the kettles were genuinely surreptitious and therefore the small children had to find them, fill them with water and plug them in. That seemed a stretch to me. But my original assumption might be erroneous.
no subject
no subject
And then they can set it up and make it work? I think I’m now wondering if our definitions of small are very different. (I mean, obviously I defer to the person who knows the actual domain, but it still surprises me.)
no subject
My own children (9 and 11 now) can use a kettle safely, because I taught them (along with the toaster and the microwave).
no subject
no subject